Fall 2005

H e a l t h   P o l i c y
Ruling on private insurance has far-reaching impact 


Carlton Technology Resources Photo

 

What is ultimately at issue in the case is whether the Canadian public should have wider access to privately-funded preferential medical care.

by Roger Chafe

There was a great deal of discussion over the summer about the Supreme Court’s ruling regarding private medical insurance. In June, the Court ruled that a Quebec law banning the sale of private medical insurance for medical services already covered by the public health care system violates Quebec’s Charter of Human Rights and Freedom.

While the Court’s ruling relates only to Quebec, it is likely to have an impact right across the country. It is worthwhile considering what the likely impact will be on our province.

What is ultimately at issue in the case is whether the Canadian public should have wider access to privately-funded preferential medical care.

Canada is distinct from other industrialized countries to the extent that it does not have a parallel private system for the services covered by the public system. For example, care provided in hospitals and by family doctors is almost exclusively publicly funded.

Private medical care is not illegal in Canada. But the provinces do employ a number of disincentives to discourage a parallel private system. The disincentives used vary from province to province. One of the main disincentives used is to deny physicians the opportunity to work under the public insurance plan and to also have eligible patients paying privately. In other words, physicians are forced to choose between whether they will have only patients who pay for services themselves or patients who are covered under public provincial plans.

Some provinces deny any public subsidy to patients of physicians who opt out of their Medicare program. Some provinces do not allow physicians who opt out of the public system to bill patients more than what they would under the public system. Others ban the sale of private insurance for services covered by the public plan. It is this last legal disincentive which is the subject of the recent Supreme Court case.

In a strictly legal sense, the Court’s allowing for the sale of private medical insurance will have no effect in Newfoundland as the sale of private medical insurance for medical services covered by the public health care system is not banned here.

The true impact of the ruling, however, goes beyond what the court specifically grants in this case. Rather, the real impact in this province relates to the tone the ruling sets in the debate about whether to have a two-tier health care system. The ruling gives a good deal of insight into how the Supreme Court is likely to rule in future cases involving limitations on privately funded health care, wait times, and the rights of patients and providers to move outside of the public system.

In this case, the Supreme Court of Canada made a poor decision, unsupported by most of the relevant evidence. Still, the ruling is a victory for those across the country who advocate increased private health care and who support some Canadians having access to a privileged, two-tier health care system. In the end, it is still up to the government, health care providers, and the public of this province to determine where we go from here.

Roger Chafe is a doctoral candidate in the Community Health Program of Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Feedback

Rating

 Poor Average Good Excellent 

 

Comments

 

Site Map | DisclaimerCredits | Webmaster
© Newfoundland and Labrador Medical Association (NLMA)

Articles

Summary

Actions needed now to shore up medical care system

Make time to take care of yourself

Doctor’s notebooks digitized

Eastern Health now largest health organization in province

Privacy law and health records

Survey shows women know they should have a pap test… so why aren't they?

Unbiased evidence: CCOHTA delivers research on drugs, medical devices and systems

Ruling on private insurance has far-reaching impact

Projects support development of the provincial electronic health record

Nutrition first mantra of Kids Eat Smart

Return of capital

Celiac disease: The hidden epidemic

Mobilizing primary health care renewal

Resource kit to help physicians help problem gamblers

Topics
A&E
AGM
Arbitration
Archives
Clinical Practice
CMA News
Common Revolt Against Paperwork (C.R.A.P.)
Corporate
Doctors in the News
Education
Events
Executive Director's Message
Financial
General Council
Government Relations
Health Administration
Health Policy
Health Promotion
Health Technology
In Memoriam
Information Technology
Job Action
Membership
Perspectives
Physician Wellness
Practice Management
Primary Care Renewal
Privacy
Resident's Corner
Staff
WHSCC
Inserts
CMA Leadership in Practice**
Primary Health Care poster**
Eastern Health poster**
Issues
Winter 2013
Summer 2013
Spring 2013
Winter 2012
Fall 2012
Summer 2012
Spring 2012
Winter 2011
Fall 2011
Summer 2011
Spring 2011
Winter 2010-11
Fall 2010
Summer 2010
Spring 2010
Winter 2009
Fall 2009
Summer 2009
Spring 2009
Winter 2008
Fall 2008
Summer 2008
Spring 2008
Winter 2007
Fall 2007
Summer 2007
Spring 2007
Winter 2006
Fall 2006
Summer 2006
Spring 2006
Winter 2005
Fall 2005
Summer 2005
Spring 2005
Winter 2004
Fall 2004
Summer 2004
Spring 2004
Winter 2003
Fall 2003
Summer 2003
Spring 2003
Fall/Winter 2002
Nexus
Nexus DEFINED
A connected group or series; a bond, a connection.

Nexus is published quarterly for Newfoundland and Labrador's physicians. It is a forum for the exchange of views, ideas and information for members.